Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing OBJN: Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing tem como objetivo a divulgação e discussão da produção acadêmica e científica. Trata-se de reconhecer a necessidade de coexistência entre as diferentes vertentes de investigação no campo da enfermagem, alimentando o debate constante como forma de incentivo à produção científica. Ao mesmo tempo, visa estimular o diálogo com diferentes áreas do conhecimento, cujos temas se relacionem ao campo da saúde.
Público da revista: Professores, Pesquisadores, Profissionais de saúde, Alunos de graduação e pós-graduação e áreas afins.
OBJN: Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing é uma publicação vinculada a Escola de Enfermagem Aurora de Afonso Costa da Universidade Federal Fluminense.
Classificação Qualis: B1
Editoras responsáveis: Ana Carla Dantas Cavalcanti e Paula Vanessa Peclat Flores.
- Low-Level Laser Dosimetry for Venous Ulcer Healing: A Protocol for Systematic Reviewpor Cilene Fernandes Soares el abril 23, 2024 a las 12:00 am
Objective: To analyze the dosimetry of low-level laser therapy in the healing process of venous ulcers. Method: This is a protocol for systematic review registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under registry code CRD420211256286. Articles will be searched in 11 databases using Portuguese, English, and Spanish languages. The export of publications will follow the steps of study identification, selection, and data extraction. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus among reviewers; if they persist, a third reviewer will be consulted to decide whether to include the material. The Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool will be used to assess the validity of randomized clinical trials, while the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool will be used to assess the risk of bias in non-randomized clinical trials. The critical analysis of selected materials on dosimetry of low-level laser therapy for venous ulcer healing will result in a narrative synthesis without meta-analysis.
- Environmental Health Practice and Quality of Nursing Care: A Protocol for Systematic Reviewpor Delfina Ana Pereira Ramos Teixeira el abril 23, 2024 a las 12:00 am
Objectives: To systematically synthesize studies that analyze the relationship between a healthy practice environment and quality of nursing care in hospital settings; to identify the most commonly used instruments to assess nurses’ perceptions of a healthy practice environment; to identify the most commonly used instruments to assess nurses’ perceptions of quality of nursing care. Method: A systematic literature review will be conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The literature search will be conducted in the principal databases. Review of international scientific articles published in the last ten years, accessed through the database of the Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, on nurses’ perceptions of the influence of the environment on healthy nursing practice and quality of care. Inclusion: Articles published after 2012 in Portuguese, Spanish, and English. The identified, selected, and included studies will be highlighted for the selection process using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). If possible, quantitative data will be pooled into a meta-analysis using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (MASTARI).
- Risk factors for peristomal skin complications in elimination stomas: a systematic review and meta-synthesis protocolpor Maria Elisiane Esmeraldo Feitosa el marzo 20, 2024 a las 12:00 am
Objective: To analyze risk factors for peristomal skin complications in elimination stomas. Method: A systematic review and meta-synthesis protocol will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the methodological guidelines and recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Two independent researchers will perform searches in the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, PubMed via CAPES, and LILACS. Eligible studies will include observational studies, experimental studies, and quasi-experimental studies published in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, focusing on risk factors for peristomal skin complications in elimination stomas. A software will be used to aid in the study selection process. The risk of bias will be presented using weighted bar graphs and traffic light plots to display the results for each assessed domain in each included study. The meta-synthesis will be conducted using qualitative analysis software, employing textual similarity analysis.
- Quality of Life of Type 1 Neurofibromatosis Patients: A Scoping Review Protocolpor Lucas Paulo de Souza el marzo 19, 2024 a las 12:00 am
Objective: To map concepts, findings, and limitations related to quality of life in children, adolescents, and young adults with neurofibromatosis type 1. Method: This is a scoping review protocol based on Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Data searches will be conducted on platforms including PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Lilacs, CINAHL, Open Grey, and Google Scholar. The retrieved manuscripts will be organized using the Rayyan tool for duplicate identification and removal. Subsequently, the articles and other materials will be processed in the same tool for screening and selection of eligible studies by two independent researchers, and this entire process will be described in a flowchart adapted from the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Data extracted from eligible manuscripts will be presented in tables, figures, and flowcharts as appropriate. The data will be discussed and correlated to identify potential strengths and limitations related to the research topic.
- Bedside ultrasound execution for critical patient: scope review protocolpor Ladyanne Kessin Flores el marzo 15, 2024 a las 12:00 am
Purpose: To describe the scientific evidence about bedside ultrasound performed by health professionals in a critical environment. Method: Scope review based on Joanna Briggs Institute methodological terms and standards, guided by the question “How is the use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound - POCUS / ultrasound at the bedside described in the literature by health professionals in direct care to critical patients?”. The search involves nine databases and in the gray literature. The selection of evidence is in three stages, and the Mendeley software is used for the management of study references. The studies evaluation is based on the pre-established inclusion criteria, and was carried out by three reviewers, two independently and a third for the assessment of differences. The extracted data has a descriptive and synthetic presentation of the results.