Nutrients, Vol. 17, Pages 3279: Marine-Based Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Nutrients, Vol. 17, Pages 3279: Marine-Based Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Nutrients doi: 10.3390/nu17203279

Authors:
Arghavan Basirat
Juan Francisco Merino-Torres

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a set of cardiometabolic abnormalities, including central obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and hyperglycemia, that substantially increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Marine-derived omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs), especially eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), may improve MetS components through triglyceride-lowering, anti-inflammatory, and insulin-sensitizing effects; however, randomized controlled trial (RCT) results remain inconsistent, and the influence of dose and intervention duration is unclear. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched to June 2024 for RCTs in adults with MetS or its components. Eligible trials assessed marine-derived omega-3 supplementation (EPA/DHA) versus placebo or control and reported at least one MetS diagnostic criterion (triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, fasting plasma glucose, blood pressure, or waist circumference) or related parameter (LDL cholesterol, HOMA-IR, or HbA1c). Data were extracted in duplicate and quality assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool. Trials were categorized by dose—low (<1000 mg/day), medium (1000–2000 mg/day), and high (>2000 mg/day)—and duration: short-term (ST; ≤8 weeks), medium-term (MT; >8–12 weeks), and long-term (LT; >12 weeks). Meta-regression using ordinary least squares estimated dose–duration effects. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots and Egger’s test for outcomes with ≥3 studies. Results: Twenty-one RCTs (n ≈ 1950) were included. For triglycerides, the largest reductions occurred in the high-dose LT (−56.78 mg/dL ± 3.44) and ST (−50.873 mg/dL ± 3.04) groups, and MT duration (−41.536 mg/dL ± 4.12), showing that in high doses of omega-3, the beneficial effect of reducing TGs was more prominent in long-term and short-term treatment other than with medium-term duration of treatment. In comparison, the result for medium-dose with MT duration was (−24.93 mg/dL ± 0.464) and for LT duration was (−31.843 mg/dL ± 0.46), all p < 0.001. In LDL cholesterol, an increase in the low-dose ST group (+7.04 mg/dL ± 4, p < 0.001) and low-dose LT group (+35.525 mg/dL ± 4.33, p < 0.001) was observed. In other subgroups, either there were no data available or the number of studies was limited and could not be considered as statistically significant in meta-analysis due to low power. As for HDL cholesterol, FBS, SBP, DBP, waist circumference, BMI, and HOMA-IR, the data extracted from the included studies were not sufficient to be eligible for the meta-analysis. Conclusions: Marine-derived omega-3 supplementation produces substantial triglyceride reductions, especially at doses >2000 mg/day for ≥8 weeks. HDL cholesterol and blood pressure benefits are not consistent, fasting glycemia is largely unaffected, and LDL cholesterol may increase, especially in low doses. High-dose marine omega-3s can be considered as part of dietary strategies for MetS management, with monitoring for LDL changes. Standardized intervention protocols and long-term RCTs are needed to clarify dose and duration–response relationships.

​Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a set of cardiometabolic abnormalities, including central obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and hyperglycemia, that substantially increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Marine-derived omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs), especially eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), may improve MetS components through triglyceride-lowering, anti-inflammatory, and insulin-sensitizing effects; however, randomized controlled trial (RCT) results remain inconsistent, and the influence of dose and intervention duration is unclear. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched to June 2024 for RCTs in adults with MetS or its components. Eligible trials assessed marine-derived omega-3 supplementation (EPA/DHA) versus placebo or control and reported at least one MetS diagnostic criterion (triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, fasting plasma glucose, blood pressure, or waist circumference) or related parameter (LDL cholesterol, HOMA-IR, or HbA1c). Data were extracted in duplicate and quality assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool. Trials were categorized by dose—low (<1000 mg/day), medium (1000–2000 mg/day), and high (>2000 mg/day)—and duration: short-term (ST; ≤8 weeks), medium-term (MT; >8–12 weeks), and long-term (LT; >12 weeks). Meta-regression using ordinary least squares estimated dose–duration effects. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots and Egger’s test for outcomes with ≥3 studies. Results: Twenty-one RCTs (n ≈ 1950) were included. For triglycerides, the largest reductions occurred in the high-dose LT (−56.78 mg/dL ± 3.44) and ST (−50.873 mg/dL ± 3.04) groups, and MT duration (−41.536 mg/dL ± 4.12), showing that in high doses of omega-3, the beneficial effect of reducing TGs was more prominent in long-term and short-term treatment other than with medium-term duration of treatment. In comparison, the result for medium-dose with MT duration was (−24.93 mg/dL ± 0.464) and for LT duration was (−31.843 mg/dL ± 0.46), all p < 0.001. In LDL cholesterol, an increase in the low-dose ST group (+7.04 mg/dL ± 4, p < 0.001) and low-dose LT group (+35.525 mg/dL ± 4.33, p < 0.001) was observed. In other subgroups, either there were no data available or the number of studies was limited and could not be considered as statistically significant in meta-analysis due to low power. As for HDL cholesterol, FBS, SBP, DBP, waist circumference, BMI, and HOMA-IR, the data extracted from the included studies were not sufficient to be eligible for the meta-analysis. Conclusions: Marine-derived omega-3 supplementation produces substantial triglyceride reductions, especially at doses >2000 mg/day for ≥8 weeks. HDL cholesterol and blood pressure benefits are not consistent, fasting glycemia is largely unaffected, and LDL cholesterol may increase, especially in low doses. High-dose marine omega-3s can be considered as part of dietary strategies for MetS management, with monitoring for LDL changes. Standardized intervention protocols and long-term RCTs are needed to clarify dose and duration–response relationships. Read More

Full text for top nursing and allied health literature.

X