ABSTRACT
There is growing attention to the influence of commercial milk formula (CMF) marketing on health professionals and their professional associations, with ongoing controversies about the conflicts of interest created by the CMF industry and how health professionals and their associations can avoid them. Australian guidelines state that health workers should implement the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes (the Code), and a recent regulatory review considered whether health professional association (HPA) ethical codes and standards require compliance with the Code. However, evidence was lacking. This study aimed to assess the extent to which Australian HPAs’ codes and standards require compliance with the Code. Sampled were national associations of regulated health professionals likely to provide health care to mothers and infants. Online searches of websites of these Australian HPAs were conducted in 2021 and repeated in 2024, to identify documents on professional ethics on the Code and breastfeeding. To assess the documents, we developed a simple scoring system and tool using the eight critical elements of the Code and World Health Organisation guidance for health workers. Searches identified 19 within-scope associations. Most (15/19) had no provisions relating to the Code or Guidance in their ethics or standards documents in 2024. Only one comprehensively covered the Code components and just five scored above 50 per cent. Professional association codes of ethics and standards in Australia do not prevent health professionals being influenced by CMF company marketing or ensure breastfeeding is protected, promoted and supported in line with health worker responsibilities under Australian guidelines and the Code. Future research could apply this scoring system in other country settings, and for other HPAs.
Maternal &Child Nutrition, EarlyView. Read More