Nutrients, Vol. 17, Pages 2997: Effect of Behavioral Change Communication and Livestock Feed Intervention on Dietary Practices in a Kenyan Pastoral Community: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Nutrients doi: 10.3390/nu17182997
Authors:
Nyamai Mutono
Josphat Muema
Zipporah Bukania
Irene Kimani
Erin Boyd
Immaculate Mutua
George Gacharamu
Francis Wambua
Anita Makori
Joseph Njuguna
Christine Jost
Abdal Monium Osman
Darana Souza
Guy H. Palmer
Jonathan Yoder
S. M. Thumbi
Low dietary diversity is a key driver of undernutrition and remains a significant public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries. This study evaluated the effect of nutritional counselling and the provision of livestock feed, aimed at sustaining milk production during dry periods, on the dietary diversity of women and children in a pastoralist setting. Methods: A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted among households in Laisamis subcounty, north-eastern Kenya, which were assigned to one of three arms: (1) an intervention arm providing livestock feed during critically dry periods, (2) an intervention arm providing livestock feed plus enhanced nutritional counselling (provided once a week, covering topics including hygiene and sanitation, breastfeeding, maternal nutrition, immunization and complementary feeding) or (3) a control arm. The dietary diversity of mothers and children was assessed every six weeks over two years. Panel difference-in-difference regression models were used to estimate intervention effects on dietary outcomes including child minimum dietary diversity (MDD), minimum acceptable diet (MAD), women’s dietary diversity (MDD-W) and food security. Results: A total of 1734 households participated (639 in arm 1, 585 in arm 2, and 510 in the control arm). The provision of livestock feed alone had significant gains in child MAD (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.08–1.34), child MDD (OR 1.15; 1.11–1.20), and MDD-W (OR 1.10; 1.01–1.19) whereas combined livestock feed with counselling, reduced child food poverty (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.81–0.99), increased child MAD (OR 1.39; 1.22–1.52), and improved MDD-W (OR 1.21; 1.16–1.28) relative to control. Neither intervention increased child minimum meal frequency relative to control. Purchasing livestock was associated with higher odds of meeting dietary-diversity indicators but a lower meal frequency (OR 0.80; 0.80–0.90); in contrast, cash-transfer receipt was linked to reduced odds of achieving child MDD (OR 0.90; 0.87–0.94), child MAD (OR 0.95; 0.85–0.97), and women’s MDD (OR 0.73; 0.54–0.89). Conclusions: Livestock feed provision sustains milk consumption and improves dietary diversity in pastoralist populations. When combined with nutritional counselling, these interventions strengthen the link between animal and human health, with important implications for food security.
Low dietary diversity is a key driver of undernutrition and remains a significant public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries. This study evaluated the effect of nutritional counselling and the provision of livestock feed, aimed at sustaining milk production during dry periods, on the dietary diversity of women and children in a pastoralist setting. Methods: A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted among households in Laisamis subcounty, north-eastern Kenya, which were assigned to one of three arms: (1) an intervention arm providing livestock feed during critically dry periods, (2) an intervention arm providing livestock feed plus enhanced nutritional counselling (provided once a week, covering topics including hygiene and sanitation, breastfeeding, maternal nutrition, immunization and complementary feeding) or (3) a control arm. The dietary diversity of mothers and children was assessed every six weeks over two years. Panel difference-in-difference regression models were used to estimate intervention effects on dietary outcomes including child minimum dietary diversity (MDD), minimum acceptable diet (MAD), women’s dietary diversity (MDD-W) and food security. Results: A total of 1734 households participated (639 in arm 1, 585 in arm 2, and 510 in the control arm). The provision of livestock feed alone had significant gains in child MAD (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.08–1.34), child MDD (OR 1.15; 1.11–1.20), and MDD-W (OR 1.10; 1.01–1.19) whereas combined livestock feed with counselling, reduced child food poverty (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.81–0.99), increased child MAD (OR 1.39; 1.22–1.52), and improved MDD-W (OR 1.21; 1.16–1.28) relative to control. Neither intervention increased child minimum meal frequency relative to control. Purchasing livestock was associated with higher odds of meeting dietary-diversity indicators but a lower meal frequency (OR 0.80; 0.80–0.90); in contrast, cash-transfer receipt was linked to reduced odds of achieving child MDD (OR 0.90; 0.87–0.94), child MAD (OR 0.95; 0.85–0.97), and women’s MDD (OR 0.73; 0.54–0.89). Conclusions: Livestock feed provision sustains milk consumption and improves dietary diversity in pastoralist populations. When combined with nutritional counselling, these interventions strengthen the link between animal and human health, with important implications for food security. Read More