Nutrients, Vol. 17, Pages 2246: Least Significant Change (LSC) for Serum Concentrations of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D
Nutrients doi: 10.3390/nu17132246
Authors:
Pawel Pludowski
Marek Wójcik
Maciej Jaworski
Agnieszka Ochocińska
William B. Grant
Michael F. Holick
Background: The least significant change (LSC) method should be introduced and considered a proper method to define the smallest clinically important difference between two consecutive measurements. Methods: The LSC was calculated based on 150 patients, with a total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] IDS-iSYS assay performed in triplicate. The LSC was determined by multiplying the calculated root mean square precision error by a factor of 2.77. The study group was additionally divided into subgroups according to gender, age, serum 25(OH)D concentration, and date of assays. Results: The LSC was 4.0 ng/mL (13.2%) for the entire group (n = 150; 450 assays) and was not dependent on gender, age of patients, or the date of assays (p > 0.05). The LSC value depended only on the 25(OH)D concentration value. In the subgroup with vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL), the obtained LSC value was 2.2 ng/mL (14.7%), which was lower compared to all other groups (p < 0.05 for insufficiency, and p < 0.0001 for the optimal concentration value). In the subgroup with 25(OH)D concentrations >50 ng/mL (n = 4; 12 assays), the calculated LSC was 11.8 ng/mL (16.9%) and differed statistically only from the subgroup with vitamin D deficiency (p < 0.005). Conclusions: An absolute LSC of 4.0 ng/mL was calculated for the IDS-iSYS assay used in our study and should be considered when two (or more) assay results of 25(OH)D performed for a single patient are compared.
Background: The least significant change (LSC) method should be introduced and considered a proper method to define the smallest clinically important difference between two consecutive measurements. Methods: The LSC was calculated based on 150 patients, with a total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] IDS-iSYS assay performed in triplicate. The LSC was determined by multiplying the calculated root mean square precision error by a factor of 2.77. The study group was additionally divided into subgroups according to gender, age, serum 25(OH)D concentration, and date of assays. Results: The LSC was 4.0 ng/mL (13.2%) for the entire group (n = 150; 450 assays) and was not dependent on gender, age of patients, or the date of assays (p > 0.05). The LSC value depended only on the 25(OH)D concentration value. In the subgroup with vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL), the obtained LSC value was 2.2 ng/mL (14.7%), which was lower compared to all other groups (p < 0.05 for insufficiency, and p < 0.0001 for the optimal concentration value). In the subgroup with 25(OH)D concentrations >50 ng/mL (n = 4; 12 assays), the calculated LSC was 11.8 ng/mL (16.9%) and differed statistically only from the subgroup with vitamin D deficiency (p < 0.005). Conclusions: An absolute LSC of 4.0 ng/mL was calculated for the IDS-iSYS assay used in our study and should be considered when two (or more) assay results of 25(OH)D performed for a single patient are compared. Read More