Nutrients, Vol. 17, Pages 2349: Clinical Effectiveness of Oral Semaglutide in Women with Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide, Multicentre, Retrospective, Observational Study (Women_ENDO2S-RWD Substudy)

Nutrients, Vol. 17, Pages 2349: Clinical Effectiveness of Oral Semaglutide in Women with Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide, Multicentre, Retrospective, Observational Study (Women_ENDO2S-RWD Substudy)

Nutrients doi: 10.3390/nu17142349

Authors:
Rebeca Reyes-Garcia
Oscar Moreno-Pérez
Cristina Guillen-Morote
Inés Modrego-Pardo
Viyey Kishore Doulatram-Gamgaram
Carlos Casado Cases
Nieves Arias Mendoza
Cristina Tejera-Pérez
Jersy Cárdenas-Salas
Sandra Martínez-Fuster
Beatriz Lardiés-Sánchez
Rosa Márquez-Pardo
Pedro Pinés
Antonio Tejera-Muñoz
José Carlos Fernández-García
on behalf of the SEEN Diabetes Area

Background: Sex differences in type 2 diabetes (T2D) are a growing area of diabetes research. No data have been reported on sex differences with oral semaglutide (oSEMA) in a real-world setting. Methods: We included people with T2D who started treatment with oSEMA in routine clinical practice between November 2021 and November 2022, with at least one report of clinical follow-up (FU) data at 3 months. We evaluated in women with T2D (WWT2D) the clinical effectiveness of oSEMA and factors associated with clinical response and persistence. We also analyzed differences in baseline characteristics, clinical effectiveness, persistence rates and safety according to biological sex. Results: Of the 1018 subjects [median age: 63 years, body mass index (BMI): 33.8 kg/m2, HbA1c: 7.8%], 469 were WWT2D. In WWT2D, oSEMA reduced HbA1c by 0.7% [−0.1 to −1.3] and 0.9% [−0.2 to −1.5] at the 6- and 12-month FU visits, while weight decreased by 4.6% [2.0 to 7.9] and 7.2% [2.5 to 10.9], respectively. Weight loss was >10% in 29.8% of WWT2D (95% CI 25.8 to 34.1); meanwhile, the combined endpoint (HbA1c decrease ≥ 1% + weight reduction ≥ 5%) was achieved in 23.5% (95% CI 19.8 to 27.5%) of WWT2D at the 12-month FU visit. Achievement of glycaemic targets was similar in women and men (59.3% vs. 61.1%). We found no sex differences in weight loss (6.9% vs. 6.8%), oSEMA maintenance dose, persistence rate (76.3% vs. 77.3%), or adverse events. Conclusions: oSEMA was effective and safe in WWT2D in a real-world setting, with nearly one-third of patients reporting weight loss >10% and more than two-thirds achieving HbA1c < 7%. oSEMA showed no sex bias in terms of effectiveness and safety.

​Background: Sex differences in type 2 diabetes (T2D) are a growing area of diabetes research. No data have been reported on sex differences with oral semaglutide (oSEMA) in a real-world setting. Methods: We included people with T2D who started treatment with oSEMA in routine clinical practice between November 2021 and November 2022, with at least one report of clinical follow-up (FU) data at 3 months. We evaluated in women with T2D (WWT2D) the clinical effectiveness of oSEMA and factors associated with clinical response and persistence. We also analyzed differences in baseline characteristics, clinical effectiveness, persistence rates and safety according to biological sex. Results: Of the 1018 subjects [median age: 63 years, body mass index (BMI): 33.8 kg/m2, HbA1c: 7.8%], 469 were WWT2D. In WWT2D, oSEMA reduced HbA1c by 0.7% [−0.1 to −1.3] and 0.9% [−0.2 to −1.5] at the 6- and 12-month FU visits, while weight decreased by 4.6% [2.0 to 7.9] and 7.2% [2.5 to 10.9], respectively. Weight loss was >10% in 29.8% of WWT2D (95% CI 25.8 to 34.1); meanwhile, the combined endpoint (HbA1c decrease ≥ 1% + weight reduction ≥ 5%) was achieved in 23.5% (95% CI 19.8 to 27.5%) of WWT2D at the 12-month FU visit. Achievement of glycaemic targets was similar in women and men (59.3% vs. 61.1%). We found no sex differences in weight loss (6.9% vs. 6.8%), oSEMA maintenance dose, persistence rate (76.3% vs. 77.3%), or adverse events. Conclusions: oSEMA was effective and safe in WWT2D in a real-world setting, with nearly one-third of patients reporting weight loss >10% and more than two-thirds achieving HbA1c < 7%. oSEMA showed no sex bias in terms of effectiveness and safety. Read More

Full text for top nursing and allied health literature.

X