Nutrients, Vol. 17, Pages 2703: Nutritional Status Assessment Tools in Cardiovascular Patients
Nutrients doi: 10.3390/nu17162703
Authors:
Izabela Jarosz
Kamil Gorecki
Grzegorz Kalisz
Joanna Popiolek-Kalisz
Background: Malnutrition is a prevalent but underrecognized condition in cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients, associated with adverse outcomes including longer hospitalizations, higher readmission rates, and increased mortality. Traditional measures such as body mass index (BMI) often fail to detect malnutrition, especially in patients with fluid retention, sarcopenia, or obesity. Methods: This review critically examines current tools used to assess nutritional status in CVD populations. Screening instruments such as Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA, MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score are discussed, alongside diagnostic frameworks including the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. The role of body composition assessment, particularly bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and phase angle (PA), is also highlighted. Results: These tools differ in diagnostic performance and applicability, with many influenced by the pathophysiological features of CVD, such as inflammation, altered fluid balance, and pharmacotherapy. GLIM criteria provide a standardized two-step approach, combining phenotypic and etiologic factors, but require further validation in cardiology settings. Conclusions: A tailored, multimodal approach could be recommended: initial screening followed by confirmatory assessment using GLIM criteria and objective measures of muscle mass or cellular integrity. Clinicians should be aware of tool-specific limitations and interpret findings in the context of CVD-specific challenges.
Background: Malnutrition is a prevalent but underrecognized condition in cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients, associated with adverse outcomes including longer hospitalizations, higher readmission rates, and increased mortality. Traditional measures such as body mass index (BMI) often fail to detect malnutrition, especially in patients with fluid retention, sarcopenia, or obesity. Methods: This review critically examines current tools used to assess nutritional status in CVD populations. Screening instruments such as Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA, MNA-SF), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score are discussed, alongside diagnostic frameworks including the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. The role of body composition assessment, particularly bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and phase angle (PA), is also highlighted. Results: These tools differ in diagnostic performance and applicability, with many influenced by the pathophysiological features of CVD, such as inflammation, altered fluid balance, and pharmacotherapy. GLIM criteria provide a standardized two-step approach, combining phenotypic and etiologic factors, but require further validation in cardiology settings. Conclusions: A tailored, multimodal approach could be recommended: initial screening followed by confirmatory assessment using GLIM criteria and objective measures of muscle mass or cellular integrity. Clinicians should be aware of tool-specific limitations and interpret findings in the context of CVD-specific challenges. Read More