Nutrients, Vol. 17, Pages 3585: The Influence of Berberine on Vascular Function Parameters, Among Them VEGF, in Individuals with MAFLD: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Nutrients doi: 10.3390/nu17223585
Authors:
Anna Koperska
Ewa Miller-Kasprzak
Agnieszka Seraszek-Jaros
Katarzyna Musialik
Paweł Bogdański
Monika Szulińska
Background: Metabolically Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) is a prevalent liver disorder closely tied to metabolic dysfunction, insulin resistance, and chronic low-grade inflammation. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) may have a dual interesting role in MAFLD pathophysiology—supporting vascular repair in early stages, but potentially contributing to fibrosis in later stages. In this study, berberine (BBR), a plant-derived isoquinoline alkaloid, exhibits multiple beneficial properties, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and endothelial-protective effects, on the study group, perhaps by influencing VEGF concentration. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of BBR in addressing vascular function parameters linked to MAFLD, particularly its impact on serum VEGF levels and arterial stiffness. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial enrolled seventy individuals with MAFLD who were overweight or obese. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either BBR (1500 mg/day) or a placebo orally for 12 weeks. The following parameters were assessed pre- and post-intervention: VEGF, brachial SBP (Systolic Blood Pressure)/DBP (Diastolic Blood Pressure), MAP (Mean Arterial Pressure), AIx (Augmentation Index), AP (Aortic Pressure), number of waveforms, Pulse Pressure (PP), PWV (Pulse Wave Velocity), and PWA-SP/PWA-DP (Pulse Wave Analysis Systolic/Diastolic Pressure). The results for the metabolic parameters—FLI (Fatty Liver Index)—and anthropometric parameters—BMI (Body Mass Index), fat mass corp—and laboratory parameters, among them, hsCRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), were published by us earlier. Results: In the BBR-treated cohort, VEGF concentrations demonstrated a statistically significant increase following the intervention, rising from a baseline mean of 456.23 ± 307.61 pg/mL to 561.22 ± 389.77 pg/mL (p < 0.0001). In the BBR group, a significant reduction in PWA-SP was observed after 12 weeks of supplementation (134.85 ± 16.26 vs. 124.46 ± 13.47 mmHg, p < 0.0001). No statistically significant differences were observed in the parameters determining arterial stiffness in the BBR and placebo groups. In the BBR group, delta VEGF correlated negatively with delta FLI; no such associations were observed in the placebo group. Changes in PWV were consistent and significantly correlated with changes in brachial SBP/DBP, PWA-SP, PWA-DP, and MAP. No serious adverse events were reported, and BBR was well tolerated. Conclusions: BBR appears to be a safe and promising adjunct in MAFLD therapy, potentially exerting reparative effects through VEGF modulation and vascular support. Further research is warranted to confirm its long-term impact and elucidate underlying protective mechanisms.
Background: Metabolically Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) is a prevalent liver disorder closely tied to metabolic dysfunction, insulin resistance, and chronic low-grade inflammation. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) may have a dual interesting role in MAFLD pathophysiology—supporting vascular repair in early stages, but potentially contributing to fibrosis in later stages. In this study, berberine (BBR), a plant-derived isoquinoline alkaloid, exhibits multiple beneficial properties, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and endothelial-protective effects, on the study group, perhaps by influencing VEGF concentration. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of BBR in addressing vascular function parameters linked to MAFLD, particularly its impact on serum VEGF levels and arterial stiffness. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial enrolled seventy individuals with MAFLD who were overweight or obese. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either BBR (1500 mg/day) or a placebo orally for 12 weeks. The following parameters were assessed pre- and post-intervention: VEGF, brachial SBP (Systolic Blood Pressure)/DBP (Diastolic Blood Pressure), MAP (Mean Arterial Pressure), AIx (Augmentation Index), AP (Aortic Pressure), number of waveforms, Pulse Pressure (PP), PWV (Pulse Wave Velocity), and PWA-SP/PWA-DP (Pulse Wave Analysis Systolic/Diastolic Pressure). The results for the metabolic parameters—FLI (Fatty Liver Index)—and anthropometric parameters—BMI (Body Mass Index), fat mass corp—and laboratory parameters, among them, hsCRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), were published by us earlier. Results: In the BBR-treated cohort, VEGF concentrations demonstrated a statistically significant increase following the intervention, rising from a baseline mean of 456.23 ± 307.61 pg/mL to 561.22 ± 389.77 pg/mL (p < 0.0001). In the BBR group, a significant reduction in PWA-SP was observed after 12 weeks of supplementation (134.85 ± 16.26 vs. 124.46 ± 13.47 mmHg, p < 0.0001). No statistically significant differences were observed in the parameters determining arterial stiffness in the BBR and placebo groups. In the BBR group, delta VEGF correlated negatively with delta FLI; no such associations were observed in the placebo group. Changes in PWV were consistent and significantly correlated with changes in brachial SBP/DBP, PWA-SP, PWA-DP, and MAP. No serious adverse events were reported, and BBR was well tolerated. Conclusions: BBR appears to be a safe and promising adjunct in MAFLD therapy, potentially exerting reparative effects through VEGF modulation and vascular support. Further research is warranted to confirm its long-term impact and elucidate underlying protective mechanisms. Read More