This article condenses the results of a research project funded by the TAI University School of Arts, which aimed to critically review the programming that underlies Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) applied to audiovisual creation. During the 2023-2024 academic year, an analysis of the contents generated by several platforms -in some cases of paid subscription- was carried out. The biases and stereotypes that emerged in the elaboration of an audiovisual piece have been analyzed.
The use of different platforms determined the construction process of the short film: from script writing, through the development of the shooting plan and the technical script, to editing and post-production. The elaboration of this audiovisual piece has served as a starting point to highlight the ideological bias of the GenAI, as reflected below in this text.
This article condenses the results of a research project funded by the TAI University School of Arts, which aimed to critically review the programming that underlies Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) applied to audiovisual creation. During the 2023-2024 academic year, an analysis of the contents generated by several platforms -in some cases of paid subscription- was carried out. The biases and stereotypes that emerged in the elaboration of an audiovisual piece have been analyzed.The use of different platforms determined the construction process of the short film: from script writing, through the development of the shooting plan and the technical script, to editing and post-production. The elaboration of this audiovisual piece has served as a starting point to highlight the ideological bias of the GenAI, as reflected below in this text. Read More